How BPM by eliminating complexity can help you reduce operating costs by 10-15% in 90 days

BPM – how can it help me reduce operating costs?
BPM (Business Process Management) as a concept that has been around for over 20 years and was first popularised in an article in the Harvard Business Review by Michael Hammer in 1990. While Hammer stressed the importance of reengineering the business around its core business processes to serve its customers more effectively, this proved in many cases easier to say than to do.

Why are apparently simple problems such as improving service processes so difficult to solve?
A Rubik’s cube appears an impossible puzzle for the uninitiated. If you don’t know how to do it, it could take days and weeks of ‘trial and error’ to solve the puzzle. And yet the current world record was set by Erik Akkersdijk in 2008, with a best time of 7.08 seconds at the Czech Open 2008 competition. Similarly, the puzzle of improving service process productivity has appeared to be frustratingly difficult for many organisations. Dedicated teams are formed, apply huge amounts of effort over 6 months and yet end up with service productivity improvements below 10%. The secret to transforming your performance in both cases is knowing the most effective strategies to deploy to be successful. So let’s explore in more detail what makes service productivity improvement so difficult using conventional approaches and how an alternative approach exploiting BPM can enable you to achieve rapid breakthrough productivity improvements.

What are service processes?
Our lives depend on service processes and they are critical to the success of business and society. They range from ordinary activities such as withdrawing cash from an ATM and changing the calling plan for your mobile phone through to arranging for an operation in the Health Service. In business terms they cover the back office processing in a financial institution through to the restocking processes that ensure your supermarket is replenished each day. Without these ‘invisible’ service processes our shops would stand empty and life would soon grind to a halt.

What are the elements of a service process?
In general, services are defined through a combination of three key elements:
i) The features of the service
ii) A delivery mechanism that defines the where are how for the service and
iii) The supporting processes to make them work.
For example for a cash withdrawal service through an ATM from your bank, the features could include withdrawals up to $500, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The delivery mechanism is through any ATM displaying the Visa symbol in 170 countries using your bank card. The service process from a customer perspective starts by inserting your card and entering PIN, then making a withdrawal request for any amount up to $500 and finally receiving the cash (if you have the money in your bank account) and having your account debited for the transaction.

Why do service processes get so complex?
There are a number of factors that combine in my experience to lead to process complexity. The first is that while the features and delivery mechanisms are tangible whose performance can be easily defined in engineering terms with hard metrics, the service processes being ‘invisible’ are much harder to engineer systematically and so often get overlooked. If you consider your doctor making an outpatient referral for you for a consultation with a specialist consultant; you’ll find that nearly every hospital and health authority will have a different service process with huge variations in terms of how quickly you are treated, the cost per treatment and medical outcomes.

In my experience, new service processes are typically launched with poor productivity; complexity is then added with new rules and decision points to be applied continually with constant further workarounds and hand-offs being created. Each time complexity increases; the amount of work per case goes up undermining your productivity and driving up costs. You could think of the eventual impact as a process version of the movie ‘Super Size Me’. You don’t notice the impact of the first few super-sized burgers, however the cholesterol from each additional super size burger clots up your arteries until eventually a heart attack occurs. Similarly as the added complexity builds up over time and volumes grow day-by-day, the process cholesterol builds up until you suffer an eventual ‘process heart attack’ as either processing costs explode or your service delivery functions collapse from being overwhelmed by too much work.

Why does productivity get compromised in new service processes?
In a new service process, even though it shouldn’t happen in theory, in practice the requirements set for new processes end up being far too complicated. Far too many requirements are included from all parts of the organisation (marketing, finance, audit and compliance). All too frequently, this is combined with a ‘hard date’ for when the new process must be implemented, so as the target date nears the project team (and the operational departments) are forced to come up with a working process no matter how complex to ensure the target implementation is seen by to be met (or face the wrath of the senior executives who are paying for the project). Worst-case scenario is a Heathrow Terminal-5 disaster on Day 1 but to be frank these disaster scenarios are the exceptions.
In most cases a more insidious problem is building up unnoticed. The initial volumes for the new process are relatively small, so the operational departments can cope. The project team is then stood down and moves onto another process leaving their operational colleagues to run the new process. As long as the volumes remain low, nobody notices the problem. You can think of it as an unexploded bomb just waiting to be set off on the operational folks once volumes reach a critical mass.

How does complexity impact service processes?
The more rules, the more hand-offs, and the more decision points within a service process the more complicated it gets. It seems obvious but is so often overlooked – the more complex the process the greater the costs and the more opportunities exist to disappoint the customer. Typically, 40-60% of activities and costs within a service process are non-value added from a customer perspective. Some of this cost may be justified from an audit and compliance perspective but this should be contained to below 5%. If service processes are a major proportion of your operating costs or service quality is critical to your business proposition and operations then this level of waste is both a significant burden and a major opportunity for you to improve performance.

What are the best measures of service productivity?
The most powerful measures of service productivity are based on focusing on the customer and business performance. The top-three performance measures, I would recommend that you implement are: are a measure of your ‘customer experience’ (such as the ‘Net Promoter Score’ (NPS) or equivalent), cost per activity and a measure of the effectiveness of your process outcome (depending on your business this could be customer lifetime value, asset utilisation, sales per square foot, patient outcome etc).

What’s the easiest approach to eliminate complexity?
The simplest and most powerful approach in my experience is to attack the complexity head on. There are straightforward tools that help you to identify the principal components of service process complexity. You simply need to apply a ‘triage approach’ to generate an action plan that removes those elements of complexity that generate the greatest cost and customer dissatisfaction in the fastest time. It sounds simple because it is and it’s an approach that works.

Why do so many IT based productivity implementations disappoint?
My background is in IT and I’ve worked with a number of the largest IT firms and users in the world such as AOL, Citicorp and EDS. I love IT and spent many happy years as a programmer, business analyst and systems designer. Clearly some IT initiatives, such as increased ‘straight-through-processing’ in transaction processing, environments are ‘no-brainers’ as they eliminate work. Well yes they are, but these often make up a minority of the initiatives within the typical IT portfolio. So what’s the fatal flaw that causes so many of the IT investment projects to deliver minimal productivity impact? My observation is that these projects start off by mapping the data, document and process flows within the existing process. By and large, the process is then engineered into an IT process that preserves most of the complexity in the original process. Indeed in some cases it’s made worse because the new IT system can now administer far more rules and complexity than was possible before. So the new (IT system enabled) process starts off with even more complexity than ever. Ultimately the new IT system, even with the latest workflow, image, SOA and web-enabled functionality fails to deliver the goods in terms of meaningful improvements to your productivity, customer experience or operating costs.

Who needs to be involved in removing complexity?
To achieve the best results, ideally you should get 2 to 5 people (from the function that operates the service process day-to-day) that can describe the process end-to-end. A smart front-line person and a team leader/ supervisor are often enough. Typically, just these two individuals can identify 20-40% of the performance improvement opportunities available. In an ideal world, if they could be joined by 1-2 people involved in the process upstream and downstream then you can identify 80%+ of the opportunities.
For the icing on the cake, if you had someone from finance who really knew the numbers and someone from marketing who defined the service offering then you would have the perfect team. All told, you will get great results from getting these 2-10 people in the same room to optimise the process.

What’s the impact of removing complexity?
So what’s the bottom-line? I’ve done projects across Europe and the USA across banks, insurance, technology, retail and outsourcing sectors where we’ve achieved 25-30% cost reductions delivered within 90 days – in some cases much higher. These may of course been special cases of high complexity, so to set a more realistic expectation (certainly when speaking to your boss) you should set yourself a target to increase productivity by 10-15% within 90 days. For more in depth case studies of applying these techniques across the whole of a business go to: http://www.closequarter.co.uk/cq-thought-leadership.html

Does this all sound too good to be true?
If you’ve been working for years and have now hit-the-wall on delivering further productivity improvements then no doubt this discussion of rapid productivity gains no doubt sounds ‘too good to be true’. If you’ve used techniques derived from manufacturing such as Lean and Six Sigma, you may be wondering what these alternative approaches designed for service processes have to offer you? If you are working on manufacturing processes in an automotive company, than Lean techniques represent global best practice and many of the planning and analysis tools can be used in any environment. However even a world-class manufacturer such as Nissan realised there was much it could do to improve its service processes when Carlos Ghosn joined from Renault. One year after he arrived, Nissan’s net profit climbed to $2.7 billion from a loss of $6.1 billion in the previous year. Nissan’s operating profit (EBIT, or earnings before interest and taxes) margin increased from 1.38% in FY 2000 to 9.25% in FY 2006. The application of Renault’s expertise to critical service processes within Nissan enabled it to transform its profitability.

Perhaps the most powerful argument is that if you’re finding your existing tools and approaches are not delivering the results that you need, perhaps it’s time to consider an alternative approach such as BPM, an approach that you could learn in a day and start seeing immediate productivity improvements this week.

What are the most powerful ‘takeaway points’ for you to consider?
In summary, the three most powerful ‘takeaway points’ are:

Typically 40-60% of cost in service processes is non-value added from a customer perspective
The key driver of costs in service processes is complexity
By using tools focused on helping you eliminate complexity, you can deliver 10-15% productivity improvements in service processes within 90 days
When you know how, the seemingly impossible becomes easy
So if you want to learn how to solve a Rubik’s cube puzzle, just key ‘Rubik’s cube solutions’ into Google and you’ll know how to do it in the next hour. If you are interested in learning more about how to increase service productivity by 10-15% in the next 90 days just apply the BPM principles you’ve just discovered.

John Corr

John Corr

Regards John.

John Corr
John Corr
John Corr (Managing Director)
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7748 2225.

PS If you would like to discuss these principles in more detail or for a confidential conversation on how they apply to your specific situation, challenges and objectives – just drop me an email or call. I’d be delighted to help you be more successful.
CLICK HERE to download a pdf format version of this article to read at your leisure

Additional resources – suggested reading

‘Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services’ by Frederick Reichheld and W. Earl, Jr. Sasser (digital download from www.hbr.org)
‘Moments of Truth’ by Jan Carlzon
‘The Service Profit Chain’ by James L. Heskett
‘Managing the Customer Experience: Turning customers’ by Shaun Smith
‘The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value’ by Frederick F. Reichheld
‘Customer Expectation Management’ by Steve Towers